- From: CVS User rfieldin <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 18:25:49 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv15056
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
ISSUE-197: disregard signal, closed on Jan 21; minor editorial tweaks made by Roy
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2014/03/12 18:10:15 1.238
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2014/03/12 18:25:49 1.239
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
</p>
</section>
- <section id='TSV-D' class="option">
+ <section id='TSV-D'>
<h4>Disregarding (D)</h4>
<p>
A tracking status value of <dfn>D</dfn> means that the origin
@@ -764,16 +764,13 @@
compelled to disregard certain DNT requests to comply with a
local law, regulation, or order.
</p>
- <p>
- Note that the <code>D</code> tracking status value is meant to be
- used only in situations that can be adequately described to users
- as an exception to normal behavior.
- An origin server that responds with <code>D</code> in ways that
- are inconsistent with their other published and unexpired claims
- regarding tracking is likely to be considered misleading.
- </p>
- <p class="issue" data-number="197" title="How do we notify the user why a Disregard signal is received?">
- [OPEN]
+ <p class="note">
+ This specification is written with an assumption that the
+ <code>D</code> tracking status value would only be used in
+ situations that can be adequately described to users as an
+ exception to normal behavior. If this turns out not to be the
+ case, either the server's decision to send the <code>D</code>
+ signal needs re-examination, or this specification, or both.
</p>
</section>
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:25:52 UTC