- From: CVS User npdoty <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv9346
Modified Files:
tracking-compliance.html
Log Message:
clarify that first party is a status relative to a given user action
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html 2014/12/29 21:36:43 1.137
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html 2014/12/29 22:44:34 1.138
@@ -211,10 +211,10 @@
<p>In some cases, a resource on the Web will be jointly controlled by two
or more distinct parties. Each of those parties is considered a first
- party if a user would reasonably expect to communicate with all of them
- when accessing that resource. For example, prominent co-branding on the
- resource might lead a user to expect that multiple parties are
- responsible for the content or functionality.</p>
+ party to a given user action if a user would reasonably expect to
+ communicate with all of them when accessing that resource. For example,
+ prominent co-branding on the resource might lead a user to expect that
+ multiple parties are responsible for the content or functionality.</p>
<p>Network interactions and subrequests related to a given user action
may not constitute intentional interaction when, for example, the user is
@@ -799,4 +799,4 @@
(Microsoft). Many thanks to Robin Berjon for ReSpec.js.</p>
</section>
</body>
-</html>
\ No newline at end of file
+</html>
Received on Monday, 29 December 2014 22:44:36 UTC