W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking-commit@w3.org > December 2014

CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts

From: CVS User npdoty <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Y5j3C-0002Qq-6Y@gil.w3.org>
To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv9346

Modified Files:
	tracking-compliance.html 
Log Message:
clarify that first party is a status relative to a given user action

--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html	2014/12/29 21:36:43	1.137
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html	2014/12/29 22:44:34	1.138
@@ -211,10 +211,10 @@
 
       <p>In some cases, a resource on the Web will be jointly controlled by two
       or more distinct parties. Each of those parties is considered a first
-      party if a user would reasonably expect to communicate with all of them
-      when accessing that resource. For example, prominent co-branding on the
-      resource might lead a user to expect that multiple parties are
-      responsible for the content or functionality.</p>
+      party to a given user action if a user would reasonably expect to
+      communicate with all of them when accessing that resource. For example,
+      prominent co-branding on the resource might lead a user to expect that
+      multiple parties are responsible for the content or functionality.</p>
 
       <p>Network interactions and subrequests related to a given user action
       may not constitute intentional interaction when, for example, the user is
@@ -799,4 +799,4 @@
     (Microsoft). Many thanks to Robin Berjon for ReSpec.js.</p>
   </section>
 </body>
-</html>
\ No newline at end of file
+</html>
Received on Monday, 29 December 2014 22:44:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:57 UTC