- From: CVS User jbrookma <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:40:13 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv29750
Modified Files:
CambridgeBareBones.html
Log Message:
Revised 6.5 to clarify lack of consensus, and to add fourth option
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/CambridgeBareBones.html 2013/02/06 03:42:55 1.3
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/CambridgeBareBones.html 2013/02/08 22:40:13 1.4
@@ -1662,14 +1662,8 @@
<h3>Disregarding Non-Compliant User Agents</h3>
<p class="note">
- This section has been the topic of active debate. One option not
- reflected below but where we may have consensus is the idea that
- a party may transmit back to the user agent a signal that it
- rejects the header as a matter of policy. It will then be
- incumbent upon the user agent how to message that to the user or
- otherwise process such a rejection. The TPE spec would need to
- include a standardized format for expressing the rejection of
- a syntactically correct DNT signal on policy grounds.
+ This section has been and will continue to be the topic of active debate. We do
+ not expect to resolve this issue at the Cambridge meeting.
</p>
<p class="option">
Third parties MUST NOT disregard DNT:1 headers whose syntax is
@@ -1686,6 +1680,13 @@
operator MUST signal to the user agent that it is disregarding the
header as described in the companion [[!TRACKING-DNT]] document.
</p>
+
+ <p class=option>
+ If the operator of a third-party domain does not intend to comply with a
+ DNT:1 signal whose syntax is correctly formed, the operator MUST send a
+ signal to the user agent that it is disregarding the header as
+ described in the companion [[!TRACKING-DNT]] document.
+ </p>
<p class="option">
No provision on disregarding non-compliant user agents.
</p>
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 22:40:14 UTC