- From: Justin Brookman via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:31:54 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv1886/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
Modified Files:
tracking-compliance.html
Log Message:
Index: tracking-compliance.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -d -r1.55 -r1.56
--- tracking-compliance.html 7 May 2012 08:07:24 -0000 1.55
+++ tracking-compliance.html 23 May 2012 20:31:52 -0000 1.56
@@ -1,2008 +1,2008 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html>
-<html>
-<head>
- <title>Tracking Compliance and Scope Specification</title>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8">
- <script src="http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/js/respec.js"
-class="remove"></script>
- <script class="remove">
- var respecConfig = {
- specStatus: "ED",
- shortName: "tracking-compliance",
[...3985 lines suppressed...]
+
+
+ <p class="issue"><a
+href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/7">ISSUE-7</a>:
+What types of tracking exist, and what are the use cases for these types of
+tracking?</p>
+ <p class="issue">Should we address the association of first party
+data with third party data? What does this standard say about a first party
+associating offline data from a third party with their own data and then using
+that in targeting? How about the first party associating it with third party
+data and/or selling it to a third party? </p>
+ <p class="issue">For now, we are using "behavioral tracking" as
+the term of interest in the scope of this document, though we may want to
+refer in all cases to "tracking" instead.</p>
+ <p class="issue">We may want to talk about including a data minimization
+piece to these exemptions</p>
+
+
+ </section>
+-->
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 20:31:57 UTC