- From: Roy Fielding via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:18:06 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv22212
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
ISSUE-136 has replaced ISSUE-117, which means it doesn't belong in the SOTD
Index: tracking-dnt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.110
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -u -d -r1.110 -r1.111
--- tracking-dnt.html 17 Apr 2012 03:54:04 -0000 1.110
+++ tracking-dnt.html 18 Apr 2012 01:18:04 -0000 1.111
@@ -66,9 +66,7 @@
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/closed">closed</a>, and
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/postponed">postponed</a>
issues regarding this document.
- </p>
- <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/136">ISSUE-136</a>: Resolve dependencies of the TPE on the compliance specification.
- </p>
+ </p>
</section>
<section>
@@ -148,6 +146,15 @@
applicability, and the requirements on compliant first-party and
third-party participants when an indication of tracking preference
is received.
+ </p>
+ <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/136">ISSUE-136</a>: Resolve dependencies of the TPE on the compliance specification.<br />
+ The WG has not come to consensus regarding the definition of tracking
+ and the scope of DNT. As such, a site cannot actually say with any
+ confidence whether or not it is tracking, let alone describe the finer
+ details in a tracking status resource. This issue will be resolved by
+ progress on the TCS document, though its resolution is a
+ necessary prerequisite to understanding and correctly implementing
+ the protocol defined by this document.
</p>
</section>
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 01:18:11 UTC