Re: registering headers and well-known Fwd: DNT Last Call review

Hi Mark,

Thank you for your comments (last June) on the TPE Last Call Working Draft. The Tracking Protection Working Group has discussed each of the issues and proposed resolutions.

Editor Roy Fielding has provided summaries of the responses in each of the tracker issues for the Last Call product; I have provided links below. I would briefly summarize the resolutions as:
* the plan is to register header fields and .well-known at CR (soon)

https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/267

Please let us know if these changes or explanations resolve your concerns.

Thanks,
Nick Doty, W3C (for the Tracking Protection Working Group)

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-comments/2014Oct/0000.html

> On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Forwarding with permission.
> 
> (This comment came in a long time ago, but I just realized that it wasn't forwarded to the publicly-archived list. Apologies — npd)
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
>> Subject: Re: DNT Last Call review
>> Date: June 22, 2014 at 8:30:44 PM PDT
>> Hi Nicholas,
>> 
>> Thanks for the heads up. I'm CC:ing in Julian, as he may have additional comments.
>> 
>> I took a quick look at <http://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/> and the specification text looks good to me (although Julian may feel differently about the ABNF).
>> 
>> One thing that does seem to be missing, however, is registrations for the DNT and Tk header fields (as per RFC3986) as well as the dnt well-known URI (as per RFC5795). If you're going to use these, they need to be registered.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>