- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:11:04 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Marcos <marcos@marcosc.com>
- CC: "public-tracking-comments@w3.org" <public-tracking-comments@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:53 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> In a private thread with one of the editors I suggested the following
> as replacement for the current API:
>
>
> enum DNTValues { "unspecified", "0", "1" };
>
> [NoInterfaceObject, Exposed=Window,Worker]
> interface NavigatorDNT {
> readonly attribute DNTValues doNotTrack;
> };
> Navigator implements NavigatorDNT
> WorkerNavigator implements NavigatorDNT
>
>
> I think this more closely matches what we want here.
>
> It's probably still not completely ideal as per Peter permission
> exposure is ideally asynchronous due to crossing process boundaries,
> but I suspect it might be too late to turn this into a promise.
My understanding was that attributes on navigator returned values that
were expected to be consistent for the browser. Are you proposing a
navigator attribute that varies based on the document origin? I didn't
realise we'd changed this. This was why the group moved this away from
the original location on navigator.
Thanks,
Adrian
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 22:11:37 UTC