- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:48:25 +0200
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Dear Team, as indicated during our call (and in the draft plan), I would like to publish the current editor's drafts (compliance and TPE) as working drafts: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html Note that according to W3C Process, agreement by a WG to publish Working Drafts does not imply that the content of the Working Draft has consensus within the group (unless the document says so). Indeed, the current Working Drafts frequently includes several options, and references to the issues list. The "Status of the Document" section of our compliance draft tries to be very explicit that text in the Working Draft is in general not consensus text. I believe firmly that, in order to make progress, we need a clean simple text to start working from. If you disagree, please provide substantiated objections to the list, i.e., why do you believe that we must not publish this text as it stands and what are the specific (and implementable) changes to the text that are needed before you are OK to publish the text as a working draft. Additional feedback is appreciated; Thanks a lot for your inputs! Regards, matthias
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 09:48:50 UTC