Publishing a working draft (deadline Sept 10)

Dear Team,


as indicated during our call (and in the draft plan), I would like to 
publish the current editor's drafts (compliance and TPE) as working drafts:
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html

Note that according to W3C Process, agreement by a WG to publish Working 
Drafts does not imply that the content of the Working Draft has 
consensus within the group (unless the document says so). Indeed, the 
current Working Drafts frequently includes several options, and 
references to the issues list.  The "Status of the Document" section of 
our compliance draft tries to be very explicit that text in the Working 
Draft is in general not consensus text.

I believe firmly that, in order to make progress, we need a clean simple 
text to start working from.

If you disagree, please provide substantiated objections to the list, 
i.e., why do you believe that we must not publish this text as it stands 
and what are the specific (and implementable) changes to the text that 
are needed before you are OK to publish the text as a working draft.

Additional feedback  is appreciated; Thanks a lot for your inputs!


Regards,
matthias

Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 09:48:50 UTC