- From: Mustaq Ahmed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:17:13 +0000
- To: public-touchevents@w3.org
If the angle interval was [0,180) instead of [0,90), every ellipse (radiusX, radiusY, rotationAngle) = (a, b, theta), where a!=b and 0<=theta<90, would have another valid representation: (b, a, theta+90). Then any use-case that needs unique representations would have to compute a canonical one. We shouldn't add a diagram for the what-if-180-degree case for sure. I think we can simply add the following text in the description of rotationAngle: "The angle interval [0,90) guarantees that any non-circular ellipse is represented by a unique tuple (radiusX, radiusY, rotationAngle)." -- GitHub Notification of comment by mustaqahmed Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/issues/53#issuecomment-170044578 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 January 2016 16:17:16 UTC