- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:13:36 -0400
- To: "public-touchevents@w3.org" <public-touchevents@w3.org>
Hi All, The errata for the Touch Events REC [1] is still mostly empty and it contains what I would characterize as a somewhat surprising statement: [[ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-touch-events-20131010/REC-touch-events-20131010-errata.html> ... An updated specification will be located at WebPlatform Specs. ]] I say "surprising" because I don't recall us agreeing to publish an update at specs.webplatform.org. Would someone please clarify? Anyhow, what, if anything should be added to the errata document? Does the CG have consensus about text for the errata document? Alternatively, perhaps the errata document could link to a version of the spec that is the REC + agreed errata text (all inlined, and perhaps styled such all of the changes from the REC are very clearly identifiable and enumerated in the Changes Since last Pub section)? Personally, I think having a document that is the REC + agreed errata changes is more useful than adding text to the errata document. -ArtB
Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 21:14:05 UTC