- From: Rick Byers via RT <sysreq@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:18:06 +0000
- CC: coralie@w3.org, doug@w3.org, plh@w3.org, public-touchevents@w3.org
+Mike On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Arthur Barstow via RT <sysreq@w3.org> wrote: > On 5/30/14 9:27 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > I don't have the context here but, unless Doug tells me that I'm > > mistaken, we don't provide access to hg to the CGs. This is simply not > > part of the services we're willing to provide. Can the work be done on > > github instead? What would be the harm in doing so? > > This CG is creating errata for the Touch Events REC (and perhaps an > Edited Recommendation) as well as updates for the Touch Events Extension > Note. We expect people to continue to use the HG location of these two > docs as the place to find the latest version of the spec. It seems > sub-optimal to have to create a new WG to do the above, thus the path of > least resistance is to allow the CG to reuse the document repo it used > while it was a WG. > > I suppose Github plus some redirection could be used instead, provided > the history can be copied. > > -Art > > > > > > Philippe > > > > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 06:45 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> The Touch Events CG wants to do follow-up work on documents published by > >> the now-closed Web Events WG. The Web Events WG used the hg/webevents/ > >> repo and it *appears* that directory is not writeable by members of the > >> CG that need write access. > >> > >> Please set the permissions of the hg/webevents/ repo so that everyone in > >> the Touch Events CG can write to that repo. > >> > >> -Thanks, Art > >> > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: Re: Should touchmove really always be synchronous and > >> cancellable? > >> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 12:53:50 -0400 > >> From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> > >> To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> > >> CC: public-touchevents@w3.org <public-touchevents@w3.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 5/29/14 10:01 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > >>> I've followed Anne's instructions > >>> <http://annevankesteren.nl/2010/08/w3c-mercurial> for setting up > >>> mercurial for w3c, but whenever I try to push I get: > >>> > >>> pushing to https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents > >>> searching for changes > >>> 1 changesets found > >>> abort: authorization failed > >>> > >>> I've verified that the username/password I have in ~/.hgrc works at > >>> http://www.w3.org/users/myprofile, and in --debug output hg does > >>> appear to be trying to authenticate with this username and password. > >>> Does my account perhaps need to be marked as having mercurial push > rights? > >> I suspect the problem is the write access rights for each hg directory > >> is on a per group basis and since the Web Events WG was closed, probably > >> no one except perhaps W3C staff can now modify the directory. > >> > >> Doug - would you please look into this and make sure all members of the > >> CG can have access rights to hg/webevents/? > >> > >> > >>> I've made a branch from 'v1' called 'v1-errata', set the status back > >>> to 'ED', updated the pub date and replaced the list reference from > >>> public-webevents to public-touchevents. All sound ok? > >> That all sounds fine to me. > >> > >> -AB > >> > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Rick > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com > >>> <mailto:rbyers@google.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Ok, I'll start looking into how to make an update with hg (I'll > >>> start with the simpler change in the other thread - fractional > >>> touch co-ordinates). Jacob if you've got any notes/advice to get > >>> me started that would be great! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jacob Rossi > >>> <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com <mailto:Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> In addition to Art’s point about the Principle of Least > Surprise…. > >>> > >>> While I prefer git to hg, my preference here is to keep it in > >>> hg so you can still diff against arbitrary editions past or > >>> present. We could also create an errata branch to separate > things. > >>> > >>> A W3C account is all that you need (technically, not > >>> procedurally) to start publishing. Rick, if you’re > >>> volunteering to do the editing then I can help you get the > >>> environment set up. > >>> > >>> -Jacob > >>> > >>> *From:*Sangwhan Moon [mailto:smoon@opera.com > >>> <mailto:smoon@opera.com>] > >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:16 AM > >>> *To:* Arthur Barstow > >>> *Cc:* Rick Byers; Doug Schepers; public-touchevents@w3.org > >>> <mailto:public-touchevents@w3.org> > >>> *Subject:* Re: Should touchmove really always be synchronous > >>> and cancellable? > >>> > >>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Arthur Barstow > >>> <art.barstow@gmail.com <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 5/15/14 10:47 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > >>> > >>> I can also make proposed edits via GitHub if that's > >>> better... > >>> > >>> I think the PrincipleOfLeastSurprise suggests people would > >>> expect to find the latest ED of the spec where the Web > >>> Events WG last worked on it i.e. > >>> < > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html>. > >>> Would you please clone that repo, try to push an update > >>> and let us know the results? > >>> > >>> If we are to do this, then I think the respec meta data should > >>> probably be rolled back so it doesn't show the document status > >>> as rec to avoid confusion. > >>> > >>> (This mixed top and bottom posting is hard to follow...) > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Arthur Barstow > >>> <art.barstow@gmail.com <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com> > >>> <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com > >>> <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com>>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 5/9/14 11:48 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > >>> > >>> So should I just propose the exact text of the change > >>> here in > >>> e-mail and leave the doc work to you Doug (which the > >>> community > >>> could then review)? Or is there some system for me to > >>> directly do the doc work, even though it'll be > >>> published by > >>> W3C staff? > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't have a strong preference for you sending > >>> proposal(s) to > >>> the list vs. you updating the ED (although it seems > like a > >>> changeset/diff would be easier for reviewers, > >>> especially if the > >>> proposal affects more than one part of the spec). > >>> > >>> Doug? > >>> > >>> -AB > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sangwhan Moon [Opera Software ASA] > >>> Software Engineer | Tokyo, Japan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 14:18:08 UTC