- From: Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:43:43 -0700
- To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
- CC: "public-touchevents@w3.org" <public-touchevents@w3.org>, jdduke@chromium.org
On 06/05/2014 03:01 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > Thanks, I see. So the text we had for radiusX/radiusY is a little > misleading Agreed. > Does Mozilla implement this on any platforms? If so then I'm fine > sticking with the slightly more confusing names, and I'd support just > bringing the old rotationAngle text back into the extensions note. > Any objection to me doing this (and perhaps adding some text to > clarify the semantics)? As far as I can tell, Mozilla does not implement radiusX/Y and rotationAngle on any platform. (On platforms where we implement touch events, I believe we expose these properties but always set them to their default values.) I have no objections to bringing back rotationAngle and clarifying the note text. > What about the "default value of 1" issue that started this thread. > Any input / history there? I think the only rationale for 1 was to prevent apps from blowing up badly if they assume the radius is always positive. This was a completely hypothetical scenario, so I wouldn't place too much weight on it. I wouldn't object to changing these defaults to 0.
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 22:44:09 UTC