- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:18:38 +0200
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:23:04 +0200, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > No big issues from me…two points > > (well, a question) FOUC is … "Flash of unstyled content" (the spec is rendered naked until the scripts have run). > I was under the impression that the W3C rec-track document is a > formalization of a snapshot of the WhatWG document. So, there shouldn’t > be a question of ‘moving to’ WhatWG since we never, afaik, ‘moved away’. > We just got tired of people complaining that there was no stable, > formally referencable, VTT spec. and decided to make one… OK, great. cheers -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 07:18:16 UTC