Re: [webvtt] Spec editing

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:23:04 +0200, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:

> No big issues from me…two points
>
> (well, a question) FOUC is …

"Flash of unstyled content" (the spec is rendered naked until the scripts  
have run).

> I was under the impression that the W3C rec-track document is a  
> formalization of a snapshot of the WhatWG document. So, there shouldn’t  
> be a question of ‘moving to’ WhatWG since we never, afaik, ‘moved away’.  
> We just got tired of people complaining that there was no stable,  
> formally referencable, VTT spec. and decided to make one…

OK, great.

cheers

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 07:18:16 UTC