- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:11:42 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
I think all of these are good suggestions. webvtt.spec.whatwg.org would be a natural home for the spec given its origin in and integration with HTML. On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > I'd like to propose (and implement) some changes in the spec editing > department for WebVTT. Feedback appreciated. > > * Convert to Bikeshed. Both for personal preference and I think it's better > at handling cross-spec xrefs, and it doesn't suffer from FOUC when loading > the spec. > > * Stop using https://github.com/foolip/webvtt-webhook - I don't know what we > should do instead but I don't particularly fancy maintaining a custom > webhook for WebVTT. Anne van Kesteren has offered to maintain a webhook if > we were to move the spec to WHATWG. Personally I wouldn't mind that, but I > don't have strong opinions about where the spec should live. > > * Move from bugzilla to GitHub issues. It seems the barrier to entry is > lowered by discussing issues in GitHub. > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 11:12:11 UTC