public-texttracks@w3.org from October 2015 by date

Saturday, 31 October 2015

• [webvtt] "parse a percentage string" parses ".1%" and "1.%" Simon Pieters via GitHub

Friday, 30 October 2015

• [webvtt] Definition of "text alignment" doesn't match processing requirements Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [webvtt] Change the syntax of Region headers Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [webvtt] Expand the introduction Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [webvtt] Have short explanations for algorithms what they're supposed to do Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [Bug 28262] [webvtt] 4.3.2 emphasis spans [I18N-ISSUE-428] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [webvtt] Clarify that <b> can use a class name and CSS Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [Bug 28265] [webvtt] incomplete ruby implementation [I18N-ISSUE-431] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28266] [webvtt] 6.2.1 processing model handling of bidi [I18N-ISSUE-432] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [webvtt] Explain the difference between cue direction and paragraph direction Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [Bug 28263] [webvtt] "valid" language tags [I18N-ISSUE-429] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 29 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Simon Pieters

Wednesday, 28 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

• [webvtt] <var> used only once: current position score Simon Pieters via GitHub
• [webvtt] <var> used only once: line offset Simon Pieters via GitHub
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Simon Pieters

Saturday, 24 October 2015

• [Bug 22706] [WebVTT] Support text-decoration-{text,color,style} on CSS ::cue pseudo-element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15023] WebVTT: Add inline style support bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22154] [WebVTT] DOM Node construction rules somewhat ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: PR: Add support for STYLE blocks (inline style) Simon Pieters

Friday, 23 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) David Singer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: PR: Add support for STYLE blocks (inline style) David Singer
• Re: Stepping down as WebVTT editor Silvia Pfeiffer

Thursday, 22 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Inline style: external resources Simon Pieters
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inline style: external resources David Singer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• [Bug 28257] [webvtt] start/end linked to left/right [I18N-ISSUE-422] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inline style: external resources Philip Jägenstedt

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

• [Bug 23269] [WebVTT] Cannot get the computed value for height and width in the proc model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Glenn Adams
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Glenn Adams
• Re: Inline style: external resources Glenn Adams
• Re: Inline style: external resources Simon Pieters
• PR: Add support for STYLE blocks (inline style) Simon Pieters
• Re: Inline style: external resources Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inline style: external resources Simon Pieters
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) David Singer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inline style: external resources Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) David Singer
• Re: Inline style: external resources Simon Pieters
• Re: Inline style: external resources Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Inline style: external resources Simon Pieters
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) David Singer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) David Singer

Tuesday, 20 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Philip Jägenstedt

Friday, 16 October 2015

• Re: Stepping down as WebVTT editor Philip Jägenstedt

Thursday, 15 October 2015

• Re: Stepping down as WebVTT editor sunil

Wednesday, 14 October 2015

• Re: Stepping down as WebVTT editor John Luther
• Re: Stepping down as WebVTT editor David Singer

Tuesday, 13 October 2015

• Stepping down as WebVTT editor Silvia Pfeiffer

Monday, 12 October 2015

• Re: [imsc] Maximum number of regions Nigel Megitt
• [imsc] Maximum number of regions Nigel Megitt

Friday, 9 October 2015

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Glenn Adams
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Nigel Megitt
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) Cyril Concolato
• Re: WebVTT, Regions and live streams. Cyril Concolato
• [Bug 28267] [webvtt] 3.1 Line wrapping for non-Latin scripts [I18N-ISSUE-434] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

• [Bug 29179] New: Validator is an undefined term bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 4 October 2015

• [Bug 28258] [webvtt] more formal grammar? [I18N-ISSUE-424] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 2 October 2015

• [Bug 28255] [webvtt] no provision for indicating overall content language(s) [I18N-ISSUE-420] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [webvtt] Spec editing Nigel Megitt
• Re: [webvtt] Spec editing Simon Pieters

Thursday, 1 October 2015

• [Bug 28259] [webvtt] Normalization and string identity issues [I18N-ISSUE-425] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2015 10:17:18 UTC