- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 00:13:50 +0000
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28262
Bug ID: 28262
Summary: [webvtt] 4.3.2 emphasis spans [I18N-ISSUE-428]
Product: TextTracks CG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebVTT
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
QA Contact: public-texttracks@w3.org
CC: philipj@opera.com, silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
Feedback by Addison Phillips from W3C I18N group:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2015Mar/0061.html
I18N comment: https://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/428
4.3.2 WebVTT cue text
http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/#webvtt-cue-text
A variety of spanning mechanisms, such as bold, italic, and underline are
provided. Some languages use different emphasis forms. Should these emphasis
types also be provided?
We advise against presentational markup of this kind, since it isn't
interoperable across writing systems and may cause unnecessary problems for
localization. (The HTML5 specification has also proposed that these tags should
be used more along semantic lines.) In the HTML case, there was a legacy issue,
but here we don't see one, and recommend instead that styling be used to
determine the presentation of the text.
For some of the issues associated with <b> and <i> tags, see
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 00:13:56 UTC