- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 00:06:19 +0000
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28258
Bug ID: 28258
Summary: [webvtt] more formal grammar? [I18N-ISSUE-424]
Product: TextTracks CG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebVTT
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
QA Contact: public-texttracks@w3.org
CC: philipj@opera.com, silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
Feedback by Addison Phillips from W3C I18N group:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2015Mar/0057.html
I18N comment: http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/424
http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/#webvtt-file-structure
The document structure is described as a sequence of prose. Wouldn't it be
better to describe it as a grammar using an established syntax such as ABNF,
EBNF, or railroad diagrams? Our WG found the document much harder to comprehend
that it might otherwise have been.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 00:06:21 UTC