- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:30:38 +1000
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > Is the question if using http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/ as > opposed to http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/ is OK? The > changes are summarized in > https://www.w3.org/wiki/ProcessTransition2014#What_are_the_main_changes_from_the_2005_Process.3F > > If the only relevant difference is skipping Last Call Working Draft, I > don't have an issue with that. FWICT that's indeed it. Silvia. > For the record, I would be happy to not take WebVTT to REC at all. I > hope that the people who do want a WebVTT REC are also willing to do > all of the work involved. > > Philip > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer > <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> FYI: I suggested using the new publication process for the WebVTT spec in >> the TTWG to get it to REC. Let me know if you have any issues with that. >> >> Best Regards, >> Silvia. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> >> Date: 4 Sep 2014 04:58 >> Subject: [VTT] Consensus call: publish VTT under the 2014 Process? >> To: "Silvia Pfieffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> >> Cc: "Nigel Megitt" <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, "Timed Text Working Group" >> <public-tt@w3.org> >> >> >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 6:05 , Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It would be nice to use this for WebVTT. >> >> Do we have consensus to do this, please? >> >> If you are OPPOSED to using the 2014 process for the VTT document(s), please >> speak up, or I will ask for it to happen. >> >> I suggest I wait two weeks for a response, i.e. the deadline is the 17th of >> September in this year of 2014. >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Silvia. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> FYI. At this stage I'm not proposing that we change our process: would >>>> anyone prefer to adopt the new process for one of our Rec track products? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Nigel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/09/2014 12:45, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Chairs, >>>>> >>>>> As announced in August [1], today W3C groups may begin to request >>>>> publication of TR documents under the 2014 Process [2]. >>>>> >>>>> Please note the following: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Pubrules [3] includes a requirement for new publications to include >>>>> a reference to the governing process. Respec [4] supports this new >>>>> requirement. >>>>> >>>>> The pubrules checker user interface includes a new feature to >>>>> identify the governing process. For now it defaults to 2005 since >>>>> most documents are likely to be published under the 2005 process >>>>> for a while; we will change that as the balance shifts. If you are >>>>> checking a document to be published under the 2014 Process, please >>>>> select that one in the interface. >>>>> >>>>> 2) We have updated transitions documentation for the 2014 Process [5]. >>>>> The transitions documentation for documents published under >>>>> the 2005 process remains unchanged [5]. >>>>> >>>>> 3) We have created a new version "Register an Internet Media Type >>>>> for a W3C Spec" [7] for the new Process. >>>>> >>>>> For additional information about the transition to the 2014 Process, >>>>> please see the FAQ [8]. >>>>> >>>>> If you have any questions, please contact me or the Webmaster >>>>> Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>. >>>>> >>>>> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014JulSep/0016.html >>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/Process-20140801/ >>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules >>>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/respec/ >>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions2014 >>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions >>>>> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype2014.html >>>>> [8] https://www.w3.org/wiki/ProcessTransition2014 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >>>>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> David Singer >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 03:31:28 UTC