- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:30:08 -0700
- To: Christian Vogler <christian.vogler@gallaudet.edu>
- Cc: public-texttracks@w3.org, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
there’s the obvious point — the FCC requires regions whose background can be painted. On May 9, 2014, at 14:29 , Christian Vogler <christian.vogler@gallaudet.edu> wrote: > That's part of it. But if it were this alone, there might be simpler ways to accomplish this. It's one of the items I'm currently trying to clarify. > > Christian > > Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse any touchscreen-induced weirdness. > > On May 9, 2014 4:09 PM, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote: > I am not sure that they are useful together, but don’t they have different visual effects? > > The background for a region causes a stable rectangular area to be painted in that color, no mater what text (if any) is inside it. > > the background for text is only drawn around the actual characters. > > the first has the advantage of visual stability, while the second minimizes the amount of the scene obscured. > > On May 9, 2014, at 7:07 , Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Does anyone know the use case for having two levels of background > > colors, specifically one background color on the individual lines of > > text and another on the region/window? > > > > The only thing I can think of is that it could make the text more > > readable for some people. However, if that is the real use case I > > think relying on regions for it is unacceptable, because the author > > may not have used regions at all. A robust solution would require the > > user agent always add that extra layer behind all cues. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Philip > > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 21:30:45 UTC