To me, positioning for speaker identification makes the most sense in terms of the anchor point - this point is the target for each speaker. Christian On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:27 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > On May 5, 2014, at 5:00 , Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > > >> (2) the background color on the width and height of the rollup area > >> needs to be changeable > > > > Why? As I noted in the "background box tweaking" thread that's still > > possible with the sum of my suggestions, but I don't understand what > > the use case is. > > >> (4) move all the cues in the region as a group to another location > > > > This is also not handled by the current spec. I don't think it makes > > sense either, why not just end the cues and repeat them in a new > > position? > > > > I agree for these that if you want something ‘similar’ to appear as what’s > already there, the clean thing to do is to re-draw it. Same content but in > a different region (with different position or colors), and so on. > > > > >> (3) font size changes on the region need to make the region go bigger > >> centered out from the anchor point > > > > That's not handled by the current spec. We've talked about using > > font-relative units but that hasn't happened. I'd love to understand > > the use case for this though. Do you have an example video frame where > > scaling around an anchor point is necessary as opposed to mode of > > scaling that happens with classical WebVTT? > > > > > > I also am curious > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > > -- Christian Vogler, PhD Director, Technology Access Program Department of Communication Studies SLCC 1116 Gallaudet University http://tap.gallaudet.edu/ VP: 202-250-2795
Received on Monday, 5 May 2014 16:32:57 UTC