- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:27:20 +0700
- To: Victor Carbune <victor.carbune@gmail.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Victor Carbune <victor.carbune@gmail.com> wrote: > A more personal comment: I feel that non-snap-to-lines cues are hard > to use for authors that want to actually position things precisely on > top of the video, and I'm not aware of other use-cases for it, so I > would even go as far as removing them as soon as we support regions. > But since they are already here, we can easily keep them for > backwards-compatible purposes with wrapped anonymous regions > fulfilling the same positioning behavior. If we go down this route I think we should try just removing the old way. I could add use counters to Blink to see if it's still possible. Would counting VTTCues where snapToLines is false be enough, or would something about position/size/align also change? Philip
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 10:27:47 UTC