On 24/02/2014 15:05, "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com<mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com>> wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk<mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>> wrote: This choice seems to be between reading text that is smaller than ideal or reading text that isn't visible at all. I'd bet it's easier to read small text than invisible text. No, both are equivalently unreadable. (Believe me, as my eyes have aged, I know!). If the user has increased the text size, it is because it is functionally necessary . And while I would prefer that the captions not obscure important on-screen information, I would take that possibility over not having the captions functionally available at all. Remember this is an idea only for a potential fallback scenario if, otherwise, the text would not fit on the screen, and therefore certainly be functionally unavailable. If this idea offers no benefit, how would you prefer this scenario to be handled? Kind regards, Nigel ---------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. ---------------------
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 15:33:44 UTC