- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 07:33:10 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:29:38 +0200, Cyril Concolato > <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: >> Le 22/05/2013 14:50, Simon Pieters a écrit : >> Lots of people think "valid" means "handled (in one way or another) by a >> parser". > > I agree. As I mentioned in OP it would be nice if the WebVTT specification flagged syntax errors in the parser. My parser implementation could be used as a guidance if you want to go down that route (I do exactly that to implement the validator bit). -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 06:33:37 UTC