Re: Live WebVTT Validator update from Simon Pieters on 2013-05-22 (public-texttracks@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:55 +0200
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <op.wxhkm5dzidj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local>

On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:53:34 +0200, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>  
wrote:

> Thanks for confirming its valid.

That's not what I said. The file you gave is not valid. It doesn't conform  
to the rules in http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#syntax

What parsers are required to do when they encounter an invalid file is a  
different question.

> Putting it in a NOTE block doesn’t stop the validator from complaining  
> though.

It does for me.

> I know where ::cue is defined, I'm just asking if the group is working  
> with the CSS working group to extend their syntax so that it becomes  
> legal CSS.

OK. I'm not aware of such work having taken place.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 12:51:34 UTC