On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > BTW: I'm happy to specify multi-line, but would just want to exclude the
> > use of empty lines in multi-line.
> >
> > So we could do something like
> > Style: |
> > captions1.css
> > captions2.css
> > .
> >
> > or
> > Style: |
> > captions1.css
> > captions2.css
> > ##
> >
> > (the latter seems like a more readable "end" character)
>
> That's a really, really ugly syntax with no precedent on the Web outside
> this group as far as I'm aware. Why can't we just do a regular block? As
> in the first suggestion in bug 15023.
>
I'm warming to this. Like COMMENT, these would not be extra headers in the
current spec, but broken cues. However, how do we identify the end of such
a directive with blank lines in them?
Silvia.