- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- cc: public-texttracks@w3.org
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > I would move the constructor to WebVTTCue, so that the hiearachy is: > > > > EventTarget > > | > > TextTrackCue -----------------------+ > > | | > > WebVTTCue (has constructor) FooTTCue (has constructor) > > > > ...where "FooTT" is some other text track format. > > Would TextTrackCue also have a constructor? I.e. do we have a generic > text track cue format? Well, without rules for how to render the cue (rules which are format- specific), I don't really see what that such a constructor would do. I suppose we could define some simple generic rules, but why would authors use that instead of just WebVTT cues? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 05:58:17 UTC