- From: Lawrence Forooghian <lawrence.forooghian@saffrondigital.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:04:18 +0000
- To: Ralph Giles <giles@mozilla.com>
- CC: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
OK, thanks. What do I need to do to get a bug raised against the spec? Lawrence On 16 Jan 2013, at 19:47, Ralph Giles <giles@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 13-01-16 9:27 AM, Lawrence Forooghian wrote: > >> If you look at the second cue (x = 00:44.000), then the first cue is a cue >> whose start time is less than x (it's 00:00.000), however x is not greater >> than or equal to the end time offset of the first cue (which is 01:24.000). > > I think you're right. The intention is that the cues be sortable into a > hierarchy with no cues at level n falling outside the interval of any > cue at level n-1. As stated, the rule is too strict to allow that, > because any nesting creates a pair where this relation is true only in > one direction. > > -r
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 09:08:35 UTC