- From: Richard Eyre <rick.eyre@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:38:30 -0500
- To: Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPUEa1+Wta-0UR_02nrOWXEOppjv+HKhvBS+QoD8FK=RNeMssQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'm not sure if this got through to the list so if it did, apologies. I don't mean to spam the list. Looks good at a quick pass Carlos. Two things: * Firefox Nightly is enabled by default now. A patch landed a few days ago for that. * Underneath the polyfill section you can list https://github.com/mozilla/vtt.js. It's a JavaScript implementation of the WebVTT spec (not the track spec). In the future it might evolve into a full <track> polyfill. Rick On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>wrote: > I took a first stab at writing the VTT tutorial. It's currently hosted in > Github to make it easier for people to contribute examples and edits to the > page. > > https://github.com/caraya/vtt-demos/blob/master/video_captioning.md > > Please take a look at it and let me know what you think needs to be > changed and what other things I should add. > > Carlos > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Great to hear your interest! >> >> I would indeed encourage to write about implemented reality, even >> though that will probably continue to improve over the next few >> months. >> >> You could explain the features as specified and then explain what >> works in the browsers now. >> >> This could, in fact, contribute to the testing efforts of the <track> >> element in HTML, see http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing . >> >> Cheers, >> Silvia. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I'd be interested in looking at working on something like this. However >> the first question that comes to mind is whether we write to the way the >> specification is written or to the way it is supported. As far as I know >> there is no complete implementation of the VTT spec available,is there? >> > >> > >> > Carlos >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:43 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> it would be really cool to have an authoring guide for VTT (unlike the >> specification, which is essentially an implementation guide) on >> WebPlatformDocs. There are some possible starting points, below, though of >> course to use any of this material we’d need to work with the authors and >> get permission. >> >> >> >> Is there someone who would like to pull this together and spearhead >> getting a good authoring guide on this important site? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/an-introduction-to-webvtt-and-track/ >> >>> http://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/WebVTT >> >>> >> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2011/10/12/html5-video-captioning.aspx >> >>> http://www.delphiki.com/webvtt/ >> >>> >> http://demosthenes.info/blog/580/Make-Online-Video-Accessible-And-Searchable-With-WebVTT >> >>> >> http://www.accessiq.org/news/features/2013/03/webvtt-and-captioning-on-the-web >> >> >> >> David Singer >> >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 01:39:00 UTC