- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:14:21 +0200
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: public-texttracks <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:45:02 +0200, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> If the use cases don't require blank lines, we can use a blank line to >> end a multi-line header. > > ouch. can we use the blank line, as now, to end the headers? Why? > you seem to want to make it possible to mix headers and cues, No, I'm not interested in that at all. > which means we have to have a more complex way to tell them apart, and > rules not to put headers after cues, and I am not sure at all why. can > you explain? As soon as you've seen a cue, the header part of the file is over. I don't see why that's harder than ending the header part when seeing a blank line. I think a blank line is more aesthetically pleasing and more in line with the rest of the WebVTT syntax (cues are separated by blank lines) than "." or "]]" or "##". >> WEBVTT >> language: en >> style: >> @import url(style.css); >> >> kind: subtitles >> >> 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000 >> cue -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 06:14:57 UTC