- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:06:46 +0000
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17257-5018-FtmJD7ieE6@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17257 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> --- HTML has to be usable without CSS too. And is. As is WebVTT. Rotating CJK ideographs makes about as much sense as rotating latin ones (which is to say: some, but it's esoteric), or changing the colour, or changing the font. I don't understand why HTML and WebVTT are different here. (If any browser implements the CSS 'text-orientation' property then please feel free to file a bug so that we add this to the list of allowed CSS properties.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 22:06:48 UTC