- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:44:19 -0600
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Victor Carbune <victor.carbune@gmail.com>, public-texttracks@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:44:49 UTC
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > I personally think it makes sense to drop such cues on the floor, > since they should not have any influence on anything, never being > active. > They can be looked up by id, which can affect scripts, especially for metadata tracks. Perhaps they'd still be read by text-to-speech systems (eg. the "read on-screen text aloud" category of use cases), which I imagine would normally ignore end times entirely. (These aren't use cases, just situations where dropping them on the floor would cause a detectable change in behavior, and that might be perfectly OK.) On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On the other hand, I wouldn't really mind if parsing timing and settings > failed for this case, since that would allow us to complain in the error > console about it. > Since it's violating an authoring requirement, I think you can already complain about it in the console if you want. (Not that you couldn't otherwise; nothing tells you what you can say in your own error console...) -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 14:44:49 UTC