- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:34:47 -0500
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-texttracks@w3.org
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 01:35:16 UTC
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > I've somewhat lost track of what we are arguing about on this thread > (it started off with may topics). I thought the introduction of script > detection was suggested as a solution for automatically switching > between identified languages, i.e. to avoid the introduction of a > <lang> elements for VTT (which would be converted into <span lang=en> > in HTML). > I don't think it was meant as a replacement for <lang>. It can't be, both for the reasons you give (language detection is a broader problem than script detection) and because heuristics will always get some cases wrong. I agree that <lang> is needed in WebVTT, with or without script/language heuristics. In the vein of this, while I don't mind having automated script > detection for VTT files as an advanced feature, I think a video player > should not be expected to implement complex script detection just so > we can support mixed language cues. If it's specced for WebVTT, I'd expect it to be a requirement. Web formats shouldn't have optional features. However, it's probably much easier to implement script detection mechanically based on a spec than to build one from scratch. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 01:35:16 UTC