- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:51:50 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:07:47 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Simon Pieters wrote: >> >> "A WebVTT file whose cues all have an end time offset x greater than or >> equal to the end time offsets of all the cues whose start time offsets >> are less than x is said to be a WebVTT file using only nested cues." >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#webvtt-file-using-only-nested-cues >> >> I have two problems with this definition. First, it takes considerable >> mental focus to understand what it means (at least for me). It would be >> nice if it could be explained more clearly > > If you can describe it formally and completely in a clearer fashion, > please let me know. I couldn't figure out a better way to do it. > > >> and/or give examples that match the definition and examples that don't. > > Done. Thanks. >> Secondly, the name implies that all cues must be nested, since the file >> is said to be using "only" nested cues, but this is not the case > > On what sense is it not the case? WEBVTT 00:00.000 --> 01:24.000 Introduction 01:24.000 --> 05:00.000 Scrolling Effects This file has no nested cues but still matches the definition. > >> so maybe the definition should have a more accurate name. I was >> considering "WebVTT file with no overlapping cues", but that's not >> accurate either if nested cues are also overlapping. > > Nested cues by definition overlap. :-) > -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 05:52:27 UTC