- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:21:59 -0500
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: public-texttracks@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABirCh9onxyi1+DnhorAV8AGMqnrdsJ3M-OPk4HHuw5wadf-0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > RFC 822 defines clearly that everything after the first null line is the > message body, not headers, so your example would have us treating > RFC822 would take a lot of hammering to make it fit here. (For example, it doesn't make sense to talk about the "body" of the message, since WebVTT isn't encapsulated *inside* an RFC-822 message; we're only talking about headers.) WebVTT basing its header data on RFC-822 might be reasonable (not sure), but I'd only use it as a basis, not as a normative definition. > p::first-line { > background: url(http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/logo-REC) no-repeat; > font-size: 10px; > span { border-left: solid 1em black; } > } > srclang: en_US > Label: 𝟎s for 王! > > as cue-text :-(. Or am I missing something? That's also the case in the > current VTT spec (that the header lines terminate on the first blank line). > > RFC 822 generally considers values as "one long line that can be folded if > it's too long", and I am not sure that's right for us. I think that > line-breaks can be significant in some of the values we cant, no? (Such as > CSS). > RFC822 is a poor fit for representing block data, like inline CSS. WebVTT should either need to use a different header style if handling that is wanted, or else use a separate mechanism for inline CSS. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 22:22:27 UTC