- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:11:05 -0500
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-texttracks@w3.org, jzern@google.com
- Message-ID: <CABirCh_EfihTfDb3m9FWYC95p=Cqc0y2eEe8aOk_rrv=h-y-wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > I think we are all pretty much agreed that the browser should in > principle ignore all headers. I disagree. It makes sense to have a copy of the <track> metadata, which implementations would use. That allows WebVTT files to be applied to video files without an encloding HTML wrapper. (Video players often load .SRT/.SSA files if they're next to a video file in a directory and have a similar filename, but they usually show up as "language: unknown". This would be worse with VTT, since it wouldn't be able to detect the data kind.) It also gives muxers a source for that metadata, so it's easier to create eg. WebM files with that data embedded. (Having to manually tell muxers what the contents of caption files are because the files don't have this sort of metadata is awful.) This means we need to think about namespacing, too, so future standardized headers can be less likely to clash with user headers. Making everyone prefix their custom attributes, like "data-*" attributes is ugly (which means many people won't do it), so maybe the standardized fields should look like: VTTKind: subtitles VTTLanguage: en VTTSourceLanguage: zh_CN VTTLabel: English with headers not prefixed with "VTT" being user-defined. That makes these headers ugly, though, which is a bit annoying since every VTT file should have them. Therefore, I would propose introduction of an interface function to > the TextTrack object [1] that provides the list of headers: > DOMString getHeader(); > In this case, the JS programmer can parse the text into a list of > name-value pairs and determine what to do with it. > Alternatively, this could be improved through introducing a > TextTrackHeader object which is a list of name-value pairs. > I'd prefer a proper API like this over than something I have to pick apart by hand. The cookie DOM API is one of the ugly bits of the platform; let's not repeat that. If we don't care about allow duplicates or preserving order, it could just return a dictionary: { VTTKind: "subtitles", VTTLanguage: "en", VTTSourceLanguage: "zh_CN", VTTLabel: "English" } which is about as convenient as JS APIs get. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 04:11:34 UTC