- From: Shane Feldman <shane.feldman@nad.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:50:34 -0500
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-texttracks@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAxSGs0k48o440u8LE9q1bsVZ84hoEbnQ1eEVyhhh=+uPG8ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
I am unable to view the roll-up captions on this video. I'm using a Mac and tried to view it on Firefox and Chrome without success. One time it said "pop-on captions failed to load". Shane On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > >> > >> BTW: in case you don't understand what I am trying to achieve here, try > >> out this video on YouTube and select the caption track "English - > >> rollup" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xTURXWoJ6A > > > > That's like ten times more annoying to read than the normal captions on > > that video. I think if we are to support roll-up captions we need a far > > more convincing use case. > > The fact is that roll-up captions are a standard means in which TV > captions have been provided in the past and that publishers want these > replicated in exactly the same way on the Web. This is why YouTube had > to develop this feature, too. Since we are making WebVTT a universal > format in which all existing captioning from TV can be represented on > the Web, too, we have to support this case. > > Captions are a legal part of a video - if you want to present a video > on the Web identically to how it has been authored, we need this > support, otherwise it's not the same artistic object and sites run > into copyright issues. It doesn't matter if what is presented is > aesthetically more pleasing than an alternative presentation - we > don't change the content of a movie for display on the Web either just > because we don't think a part of it is not aesthetically pleasing. > > Cheers, > Silvia. > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 07:51:25 UTC