- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:20:16 +0000
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY4SPR01MB199EDD4584D460DBBC6D7D3F8A10@CY4SPR01MB199.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Is the org name “web-platform” taken? You could then have: https://github.com/web-platform/tests for the tests? From: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 3:20 AM To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> Cc: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org> Subject: Re: A new GitHub organization for web-platform-tests On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:18 PM fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net<mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote: On 03/29/2018 09:34 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hi web-platform-test pioneers! > > PLH and I are trying to figure out a way to improve the management and handling of the WPT project on GitHub and Travis. As a > consequence, I've been looking at a transition plan to move the web-platform-tests repo and related repos (at least > wptdashboard and wpt-pullresults) to a separate GitHub organization. This was occasioned by the Travis capacity problems we're > having (we represent around 55% of the w3c jobs on Travis in 2018) and ensuring that the people most involved with wpt infra > can actually fix that, but there will be no doubt be more things like this as WPT as a project becomes more and more critical > to everyone's workflows. PLH has been looking at increasing the Travis capacity in parallel. This makes sense to me. WPT has a different collaboration pattern than W3C specs do. > The obvious choice for org name, "wpt", is not available, and attempts to reach out to that user have failed. No other > 3-character org names come to mind. You could use more characters? :) w3test is available if you want it. (but https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt seems fine to me) Ms2ger also suggested w-p-t, but if the lengths of URLs change at all, then certain nuisances like rewrapping comments will happen, which is why I didn't look very hard for longer org names :) > One option is that https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests would become https://github.com/web-platform-tests/web-platform-tests. > > That makes the URLs quite a bit longer, so the other option would be to also rename the repo to end up with https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt. I prefer shorter and less redundant URLs, personally. Me too. Under the web-platform-tests org, sounds like wpt is the most popular repo name suggestion so far. I hadn't really considered changing *both* the org name and repo name, do you have a concrete combination that you'd prefer over https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt?
Received on Friday, 30 March 2018 15:21:15 UTC