Re: Unifying testsuite policy and getting rid of CSS exceptions from James Graham on 2017-09-23 (public-test-infra@w3.org from July to September 2017)

From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:06:17 +0100
To: public-test-infra@w3.org
Message-ID: <ac9dadc4-81d0-7afb-d843-9bf61a6bf631@hoppipolla.co.uk>

On 9/22/17, 7:31 PM, "Philip Jägenstedt" <foolip@google.com> wrote:
> 
>      * Keep requiring <link rel=help> for CSS WG stuff.
>      * Don't require links to specific spec sections if upstreaming new tests in bulk, because then it just won't happen.

I don't entirely follow the difference between this point and the 
previous one. Is the difference "in bulk" — in which case how do you 
make the lint work, or "specific spec sections", in which case what's 
the point compared to just ensuring that the tests are in the 
spec-appropriate directory?

Received on Saturday, 23 September 2017 12:06:45 UTC