Re: Verbosity ot wpt-stability-bot

Well, if editing a single comment is doable, that sounds great. If it could
use <details> to hide the long table that'd also be great. James, thoughts
on how much work implementing that would be?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:43 PM Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I asked James about this and he asked me to seek feedback here.
> >
> > The wpt-stability-bot is amazing, but I wonder if there are any options
> for
> > making it generate less email. On
> > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4250 I did a lot of
> fixups
> > while experimenting, and wpt-stability-bot has posted a total of 18
> > comments, obscuring any real discussion.
> >
> > I think seeing the pass/fail results is useful even if it's stable, so
> some
> > visibility is great. How about it the bot only added one comment, and
> kept
> > updating that with the most recent info? Or, if it's possible to add
> > comments without generating email, it could delete all old comments for
> each
> > run.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> I'm very much in favour of it editing a single comment, as some of the
> code review tools we use do. Massively cuts down on the noise.
>
> /g
>