- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:53:03 +0200
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <0741eea4-1f29-1d03-8c2f-3e30f56ba235@gmail.com>
On 27/09/16 18:23, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > (Bcc'd public-css-testsuite and public-test-infra; this pertains to a > CSS WG proposed resolution and hence we should keep discussion on the > CSS WG's public mailing list.) > > The proposed resolution is to merge csswg-test into > web-platform-tests, doing the following: > > 1. Land https://github.com/w3c/wpt-tools/pull/90 into wpt-tools so > that the web-platform-tests tools create an accurate manifest (i.e., > list of tests) for the CSS testsuite. > > 2. Add a number of lints to wpt-tools, for the (currently > non-existent) css subdirectory, to ensure that the build system keeps > working (primarily we need lints to ensure that we have no duplicate > file-extensionless-basenames that aren't byte-for-byte identical and > that all files referenced by test files are in an adjacent support or > reference directory, with a couple of exceptions). > > 3. Ensure web-platform-tests's documentation is up-to-date and > cohesive, both for submitting tests and reviewing them. Especially > make sure it's easier to find documentation than it is currently! > > 4. Make https://hg.csswg.org/test/ and http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/ > read-only. (Really this can be any step up until this point; exact > timing doesn't matter.) > > 5. Merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests, in a css/ subdirectory, > maintaining all csswg-test history. (Do we want to copy w3ctestlib and > apiclient into it as well, given they currently live in Mercurial, and > are needed to build?) > > 6. Move over, at the very least, all open issues and PRs from the > csswg-test repository. > > 7. (Sometime in the more distant future) drop the current build system > and the lints we had for its requirements. > > I believe Alan's opinion was to give people a week to respond on the > mailing list and then potentially have a final call for objections (or > discussion!) on the next telecon (5 Oct). I'll let the chairs to say > what they want to do, though. :) Strongly support all of this. Thanks for doing the work. Ms2ger
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 10:53:47 UTC