W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: When it is appropriate to use wpt...

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:56:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHKdfMhn8cdk9yHZpMOt1fYb4kw0meQgWv+XJG2=XeBFAxt5vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Cc: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote:
>>
>> From the browser testing side: I was imagining a dummy payment service
>> (given there's no way we can test against live payment services!) in
>> wpt-tools.
>
>
> Me too.  Although it might not be in wpt-tools.  I mean, it could be.  But
> it could just be in the "test suite" couldn't it?  Or are there sandboxing
> restrictions that mean plugins / extensions to the server.py script (pipes)
> need to be outside of the test suite folder?

The only reason (and IMO good reason) is to be consistent with how we
deal with everything else which has extra server code, like
WebSockets.

/Geoffrey
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 22:56:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 21 April 2016 22:56:56 UTC