Re: Fallback to w3c-test.org

On 24/04/14 18:37, James Graham wrote:
> On 24/04/14 18:27, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> I agree with Ms2ger.  If the local server isn't working, I'd like to
>> see a
>> test failure as opposed to falling back to a third party (w3c-test.org)
>> website.
>
> Well, assuming it worked, I would expect people to disable this feature
> in production (i.e. on automation or whatever). The idea was that new
> users (e.g. at TestTWF) could get away with a little less editing of
> /etc/hosts.

This is now removed.