W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Test Review Tools

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:34:17 -0400
Message-ID: <514DD989.8070704@nokia.com>
To: ext Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
CC: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 3/20/13 5:59 AM, ext Tobie Langel wrote:
> I'm simply advocating that we should:
>
> 1. embrace the Git and GitHub flow,
> 2. use GH tools only until we collectively agree that they're insufficient for our needs,
> 3. ponder whether the benefits of a custom review tools is worth the risk of alienating new contributors used to the GH way,
> 4. if we end up deciding we need a specific tool, agree collectively to use the same one, and modify our process and tooling accordingly.

Agree.

-AB
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 16:34:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:08 UTC