- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:52:18 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:08 AM > To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L > Cc: public-test-infra@w3.org > Subject: Re: Priorities for Test Asset Development > > > When we have a common place to document it, and automated process to collect such data, these discrepancies will hopefully not occur. > > What about using <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Profiles> or a new document in <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/>? > Bryan: sounds good. I saw that for the first time during the meeting and was thinking the same thing. I really don't like excel for this type of thing, and a wiki table is a more collaboration-enabling approach. I will work on integrating the data into it. I may have to restructure the overall set of rows and columns though, along these lines: Rows: spec reference (including all references from CoreMob 2012) Columns: Spec Status, Profile, Category, Estimated Tests Needed, Test Suite Status, [Framework/Repository URL, # Approved Tests in Framework/Repository, % Automated], Remarks Thanks, Bryan Sullivan
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 17:53:19 UTC