Re: Minutes of the W3C CG meeting of 25th Jan

Thanks for the link, Leonard,

I read that this new specification is defined as a draft, maintained by the Creator Assertions Working Group led by Eric Scouten (Adobe), a WG "which builds upon C2PA by defining additional assertions".

I also read that "This specification is not a product of the C2PA itself, so it can not use the c2pa. prefix. Therefore, though structurally similar to the C2PA 1.x definition, the labels have been changed to cawg. in this specification."

ok.
Laurent
 

> Le 1 mars 2024 à 13:46, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> a écrit :
> 
> My apologies – thought I mentioined that.
>  
> We have moved the TDM assertion to a new group that is focused on identity, authorship and ownership concerns.  Everything remains the same technically, it will simply be managed by another technical working group.   See https://creator-assertions.github.io/training-and-data-mining/1.0-draft/
>  
> Leonard
>  
> From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent@edrlab.org <mailto:laurent@edrlab.org>>
> Date: Friday, March 1, 2024 at 3:16 AM
> To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com <mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>>
> Cc: public-tdmrep@w3.org <mailto:public-tdmrep@w3.org> <public-tdmrep@w3.org <mailto:public-tdmrep@w3.org>>
> Subject: Re: Minutes of the W3C CG meeting of 25th Jan
> 
> EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
> 
>  
> 
> Leonard - in your answer, you didn't respond to Giulia's question:
>  
> Furthermore, it seems that the V2.0 of this specification deprecates the "Training and Data Mining" properties previously defined in the V.1.3.  Could you please point us at the new way of expressing tdm opt-out in C2PA? 
>  
> Having the opt-out section deeply buried in the current version of the C2PA spec, or worst, absent from this version, could let people think that C2PA is not interested in opt-out after all.
>  
> Laurent
>