Re: [TalentSignal] What issue to consider next

Hello again,

Stuart's suggestion 
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-talent-signal/2019Jun/0015.html> 
[1] about providing "the specific sub-department/facility/business unit 
at which the job is based", and the JDX approach to dealing with this 
looks good.

I would like suggest that we could look at providing some examples, i.e. 
address 9 and 10 on the current issues list 
<https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements>

* There should be examples of how to refer skills requirements to 
competency definitions in a standard framework and encoding such as 
CTDL-ASN in C.E. or CASE in CASE Registry
* There should be examples of how to refer qualifications to 
EducationalOccupationalCredentials

(I would do the second of those first because we half-addressed it 
<https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Link_between_educational_occupational_credential_and_JobPosting_or_Occupation>[3] 
when building the EOCred proposal--we just need tweaks to add it to 
JobPosting.)

Does anyone have any comments or other suggestions?

Regards, Phil.


1. 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-talent-signal/2019Jun/0015.html
2. 
https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements
2. 
https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Link_between_educational_occupational_credential_and_JobPosting_or_Occupation

On 12/06/2019 15:55, Phil Barker wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have modified the list of issues 
> <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements#Issues_open_for_consideration> 
> [1] on our wiki to reflect the recent additions to schema.org and the 
> issues surfaced from the ACME Software Developer example.
>
> Are there any issues you think should be added, removed or clarified?
>
> (BTW I think it would be particularly useful to have more issues that 
> relate to adding examples and guidance.)
>
> I would also like your opinions on which issue to address next through 
> detailed discussion.
>
> Many thanks, Phil
>
>
> 1. 
> https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements#Issues_open_for_consideration
>
> -- 
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for 
> innovation in education technology.
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; 
> information systems for education.
>
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in 
> England number OC399090
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, 
> number SC569282.
>
-- 

Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for 
innovation in education technology.
PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; 
information systems for education.

CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in 
England number OC399090
PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, 
number SC569282.