I agree with your distinction, Greg.
Just that I also find it very helpful to distinguish
1(a) the definition or description of the thing that can be possessed (not
always "achieved) by a person
1(b) that actual thing, as a quality of an agent.
Maybe not many people talk about 1(b)?
Simon
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 15:47, Nadeau, Gregory <gnadeau@pcgus.com> wrote:
> I believe that this conversation is suffering from semantic disconnect.
>
>
>
> It we take the labels off and think just in terms of information
> architecture, I assert that there are two main object types:
>
> 1. the generic thing that can achieved by more than one person
> 2. the specific instance with information about the learner, issuer,
> etc
>
>
>
> These two things are modelled quite differently. Once we agree on that,
> we can talk about best terms and alternative labels.
>
>
>
> Is there an additional hard line, logical, structural difference on the
> credential to competency spectrum?
>
>
>
> g.
>
>
>
--
from Simon Grant +44 7710031657 (I'm "asimong" with many services)