RE: Next step of task scheduler API spec

Hi!

 

From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkees@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:54 PM
To: Marcos Caceres
Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org; Christophe Dumez; Wonsuk Lee
Subject: Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec

 

On Jun 27, 2014 2:38 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
> On June 26, 2014 at 1:32:13 PM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi. Chris and Marcos.
> > Thanks for quick reply!
> >
> > When is proper timing to integrate task scheduler spec with ServiceWorker?
> > We already have FPWD for ServiceWorker. Is not enough to do integration
> > work?
>
> Never too late to start thinking about how to do it. Problem is that the underlying architecture for SW is unstable and unproven so the "right way" too hook in ScheduleTasks is still a bit unclear. 
>

It seems this design has got a consensus:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0081.html

I think I'll be able to get back with a section for the extension guide in the ServiceWorker spec in a few weeks.

Note that ServiceWorkerRegistration interface in the sited discussion has not been added in the spec yet.

(Wonsuk) It sounds great! After aligned with ServiceWorker spec, it might be required to publish updated WD of task scheduler API spec to the public. Then let’s bring this to LCWD!

 

Kr, Wonsuk.

> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
>