RE: Discussing security model of sysapps

From: Anders Rundgren [mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com]
> On Apr 2, 2014 3:18 PM, "POTONNIEE Olivier" <Olivier.POTONNIEE@gemalto.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Marcos for the clarification. I agree installable applications are not strictly necessary, and SW offers a smart way to address offline mode.
> > So there are no "installable" apps, but just (pre-)"installed" apps, running with app:// uri.
> > Fine for me, thanks!
>
> Olivier,
> Now you lost me completely.  How do you mean that SE-using applications are distributed and by whom?
> Anders

I was just reformulating Marcos: we're not standardized how "installed" apps (with app:// uri) are installed.
I was not talking about SE-using apps.
--
Olivier


This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 19:52:02 UTC