Re: Life cycle and security model - status

On 15/10/13 10:12, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologize for not being regular in reading the mailing list, but the
> result is that I am kind of lost in the specifications landscape.
>
> -Runtime and Security Model for Hosted Web Applications and Packaged
> Applications is dead (or frozen)
>
> -Part of the specification is now in
> http://anssiko.github.io/runtime/app-lifecycle.html
>
> -Security model is going to be spread in different specifications (e.g.
> manifest…).
>
> -[Please add any reference that may help me to capture the big picture]
>
> Question to the working group is : how do we maintain the knowledge in
> the working group in term of vision, global architecture ? Don’t we have
> interest to keep a document like a Note to describe the solution we are
> building with those different pieces of technology ? Or maintain the wiki ?
>
> Sorry if this sounds like a detail while everyone is progressing on the
> technical aspects for the specifications, but if we want people to
> review the WG proposal in the end, we will need to explain what it is.

This sounds like an important topic for the face to face next month.

-- 
Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett

Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:26:15 UTC